Comparison
Rostad Lök vs Röstzwiebeln
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rostad Lök | Röstzwiebeln |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 573 kcal | 610 kcal |
| Fat | 43 g | 46 g |
| Saturated fat | 23 g | 23 g |
| Sugars | 11 g | 10 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 5 g | 4 g |
| Protein | 6 g | 6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Röstzwiebeln has 28% less salt (1.1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Rostad Lök has 20% more fiber (5 g vs 4 g).
Ingredients
Rostad Lök
Cipolle*, olio di palma, farina di frumento, sale. * Origine: EU. 270 g di cipolle sono utilizzate per preparare 100 g di prodotto finito.
Röstzwiebeln
Zwiebeln 76%, Palmöl, _Weizenmehl_, Salz.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rostad Lök or Röstzwiebeln?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rostad Lök has fewer calories: 573 kcal versus 610 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Röstzwiebeln has less sugar: 10 g versus 11 g per 100 g.