Rognon de porc cuit vs Rognons de porc
Overall, Rognons de porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rognon de porc cuit | Rognons de porc |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 173 kcal | 96 kcal |
| Fat | 5.9 g | 3.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 30 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rognons de porc has 45% fewer calories (96 kcal vs 173 kcal).
- Rognons de porc has 47% less fat (3.1 g vs 5.9 g).
- Rognon de porc cuit has no sugar, while Rognons de porc has 0.5 g.
- Rognons de porc has 75% less salt (0.4 g vs 1.4 g).
- Rognon de porc cuit has 47% more protein (30 g vs 16 g).
- Rognons de porc has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Rognon de porc cuit
Not available.
Rognons de porc
Rognons de porc
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rognon de porc cuit or Rognons de porc?
Overall, Rognons de porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rognons de porc has fewer calories: 96 kcal versus 173 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rognon de porc cuit has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.