Comparison

Rognon de porc cuit vs Rognon de porc

Overall, Rognon de porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRognon de porc cuitRognon de porc
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group — —
Calories 173 kcal 97 kcal
Fat 5.9 g 3 g
Saturated fat 1 g 1 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 1.4 g 0.3 g
Protein 30 g 17 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Rognon de porc has 44% fewer calories (97 kcal vs 173 kcal).
  • Rognon de porc has 49% less fat (3 g vs 5.9 g).
  • Rognon de porc has 79% less salt (0.3 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Rognon de porc cuit has 43% more protein (30 g vs 17 g).
  • Rognon de porc has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Rognon de porc cuit

Not available.

Rognon de porc

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rognon de porc cuit or Rognon de porc?

Overall, Rognon de porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rognon de porc has fewer calories: 97 kcal versus 173 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rognon de porc cuit has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons