Rognon de porc cuit vs Rognon de porc
Overall, Rognon de porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rognon de porc cuit | Rognon de porc |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 173 kcal | 97 kcal |
| Fat | 5.9 g | 3 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 30 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rognon de porc has 44% fewer calories (97 kcal vs 173 kcal).
- Rognon de porc has 49% less fat (3 g vs 5.9 g).
- Rognon de porc has 79% less salt (0.3 g vs 1.4 g).
- Rognon de porc cuit has 43% more protein (30 g vs 17 g).
- Rognon de porc has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Rognon de porc cuit
Not available.
Rognon de porc
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rognon de porc cuit or Rognon de porc?
Overall, Rognon de porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rognon de porc has fewer calories: 97 kcal versus 173 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rognon de porc cuit has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.