Rognons de porc vs Rognon de porc
Overall, Rognon de porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rognons de porc | Rognon de porc |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 96 kcal | 97 kcal |
| Fat | 3.1 g | 3 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 16 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rognon de porc has no sugar, while Rognons de porc has 0.5 g.
Ingredients
Rognons de porc
Rognons de porc
Rognon de porc
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rognons de porc or Rognon de porc?
Overall, Rognon de porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rognons de porc has fewer calories: 96 kcal versus 97 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rognon de porc has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.