Roggen Vollkorn Brot vs Rapsöl nativ
Overall, Roggen Vollkorn Brot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Roggen Vollkorn Brot | Rapsöl nativ |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 2 |
| Calories | 182 kcal | 828 kcal |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 92 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 5.5 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 9 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 4.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Sesame seeds |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Roggen Vollkorn Brot has 78% fewer calories (182 kcal vs 828 kcal).
- Roggen Vollkorn Brot has 99% less fat (1.2 g vs 92 g).
- Roggen Vollkorn Brot has 98% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 5.5 g).
- Rapsöl nativ has 80% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.5 g).
- Rapsöl nativ has 99% less salt (0 g vs 0.9 g).
- Roggen Vollkorn Brot has 94% more fiber (9 g vs 0.5 g).
- Roggen Vollkorn Brot has 88% more protein (4.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Roggen Vollkorn Brot has the better Nutri-Score.
- Rapsöl nativ is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Roggen Vollkorn Brot lists: Gluten.
- Only Rapsöl nativ lists: Sesame seeds.
Ingredients
Roggen Vollkorn Brot
ROGGENVOLLKORNSCHROT* 44 %, Natursauerteig* 29 % (ROGGENVOLLKORNSCHROT*, Wasser), Wasser, Meersalz, Hefe* *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft Kann Spuren von Lupine enthalten.
Rapsöl nativ
Kann Spuren von Erdnuss, Mandel, Nüssen und Sesam enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Roggen Vollkorn Brot or Rapsöl nativ?
Overall, Roggen Vollkorn Brot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Roggen Vollkorn Brot has fewer calories: 182 kcal versus 828 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rapsöl nativ has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.