Rodekool Chou rouge vs Le Chou Rouge, Prêt à consommer (3/4 portions)
Overall, Le Chou Rouge, Prêt à consommer (3/4 portions) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Rodekool Chou rouge
Le Chou Rouge, Prêt à consommer (3/4 portions)
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rodekool Chou rouge | Le Chou Rouge, Prêt à consom... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 54 kcal | 33 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 10.4 g | 3.8 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 2.1 g |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 1.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Le Chou Rouge, Prêt à consommer (3/4 portions) has 39% fewer calories (33 kcal vs 54 kcal).
- Le Chou Rouge, Prêt à consommer (3/4 portions) has 63% less sugar (3.8 g vs 10.4 g).
- Le Chou Rouge, Prêt à consommer (3/4 portions) has 80% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Le Chou Rouge, Prêt à consommer (3/4 portions) is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Rodekool Chou rouge
93% chou rouge, sucre, 0,7% vinaigre d'alcool, sel.
Le Chou Rouge, Prêt à consommer (3/4 portions)
Chou rouge.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rodekool Chou rouge or Le Chou Rouge, Prêt à consommer (3/4 portions)?
Overall, Le Chou Rouge, Prêt à consommer (3/4 portions) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Le Chou Rouge, Prêt à consommer (3/4 portions) has fewer calories: 33 kcal versus 54 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Le Chou Rouge, Prêt à consommer (3/4 portions) has less sugar: 3.8 g versus 10.4 g per 100 g.