Rodekool Chou rouge vs Rotkohl nach Traditionsrezept
Overall, Rodekool Chou rouge has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rodekool Chou rouge | Rotkohl nach Traditionsrezep... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 54 kcal | 49 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 10.4 g | 7.3 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 2.5 g |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 1.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rotkohl nach Traditionsrezept has 30% less sugar (7.3 g vs 10.4 g).
- Rodekool Chou rouge has 58% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.2 g).
- Rodekool Chou rouge has the better Nutri-Score.
- Rodekool Chou rouge is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Rodekool Chou rouge
93% chou rouge, sucre, 0,7% vinaigre d'alcool, sel.
Rotkohl nach Traditionsrezept
Rotkohl, Branntweinessig, Glukose-Fruktose-Sirup, Weinessig, Zucker, Salz
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rodekool Chou rouge or Rotkohl nach Traditionsrezept?
Overall, Rodekool Chou rouge has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rotkohl nach Traditionsrezept has fewer calories: 49 kcal versus 54 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rotkohl nach Traditionsrezept has less sugar: 7.3 g versus 10.4 g per 100 g.