Rode Kool met appel vs Spinazie
Overall, Spinazie has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rode Kool met appel | Spinazie |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 58 kcal | 44 kcal |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 2.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 8.6 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 2.3 g |
| Protein | 1.6 g | 1.8 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Spinazie has 24% fewer calories (44 kcal vs 58 kcal).
- Rode Kool met appel has 59% less fat (0.9 g vs 2.2 g).
- Rode Kool met appel has 86% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.7 g).
- Spinazie has 80% less sugar (1.7 g vs 8.6 g).
- Spinazie has 22% more fiber (2.3 g vs 1.8 g).
- Spinazie has the better Nutri-Score.
- Rode Kool met appel is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Spinazie lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Rode Kool met appel
61% rodekool, water, 10% appelpuree, suiker, 2,5% appelstukje, aardappelzetmeel, raapolie, zeezout, azijn, specerijen, zuurteregelaar (citroenzuur [E330]).
Spinazie
84% spinazie, water, room, raapolie, rijstzetmeel, zout, vegetarische lactose, mageremelkpoeder, melkeiwit, verdikkingsmiddel (guarpitmeel [E412], xanthaangom [E415]), natuurlijke aroma's, dextrose, groente-extract (ui, wortel), knoflookextract. Waarvan toegevoegde suikers 0.02g per 100 gram en waarvan toegevoegd zout 0.51g per 100 gram
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rode Kool met appel or Spinazie?
Overall, Spinazie has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Spinazie has fewer calories: 44 kcal versus 58 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Spinazie has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 8.6 g per 100 g.