Rocher coco vs Chocolate Blanco
Overall, Chocolate Blanco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rocher coco | Chocolate Blanco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 598 kcal | 533 kcal |
| Fat | 41 g | 28 g |
| Saturated fat | 26 g | 17.3 g |
| Sugars | 52 g | 65.3 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 5.1 g | 4 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Soybeans, Lécithine de soja, Poudre de lait | Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chocolate Blanco has 11% fewer calories (533 kcal vs 598 kcal).
- Chocolate Blanco has 32% less fat (28 g vs 41 g).
- Chocolate Blanco has 33% less saturated fat (17.3 g vs 26 g).
- Rocher coco has 20% less sugar (52 g vs 65.3 g).
- Rocher coco has 22% more protein (5.1 g vs 4 g).
- Only Rocher coco lists: Lécithine de soja, Poudre de lait.
Ingredients
Rocher coco
Sucre, beurre de cacao, poudre de lait, beurre laitier concentré, lactose, noix de coco caramélisée 4% (noix de coco, sucre), émulsifiant (lécithine de soja), arôme naturel, arôme. Peut contenir du blé, des noisettes, des amandes et d'autres fruits à coque.
Chocolate Blanco
Suiker, cacaoboter, magere MELKPOEDER, weipoeder (van MELK), MELKVET, emulgator (SOJALECITHINEN), aroma.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rocher coco or Chocolate Blanco?
Overall, Chocolate Blanco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chocolate Blanco has fewer calories: 533 kcal versus 598 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rocher coco has less sugar: 52 g versus 65.3 g per 100 g.