Comparison
Rocamadour AOP vs Munster
Overall, Rocamadour AOP has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rocamadour AOP | Munster |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 292 kcal | 330 kcal |
| Fat | 24 g | 27 g |
| Saturated fat | 17 g | 18 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 18 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rocamadour AOP has 12% fewer calories (292 kcal vs 330 kcal).
- Rocamadour AOP has 11% less fat (24 g vs 27 g).
- Rocamadour AOP has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Rocamadour AOP has 44% less salt (1 g vs 1.8 g).
- Munster has 10% more protein (20 g vs 18 g).
- Rocamadour AOP has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Rocamadour AOP
_Lait_ cru de chèvre, ferments _lactiques_, sel, présure.
Munster
Lait de vache pasteurisé.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rocamadour AOP or Munster?
Overall, Rocamadour AOP has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rocamadour AOP has fewer calories: 292 kcal versus 330 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rocamadour AOP has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.