Comparison
Munster vs Comté
Overall, Comté has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Munster | Comté |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 330 kcal | 82 kcal |
| Fat | 27 g | 6.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 18 g | 4.4 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 5.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Comté has 75% fewer calories (82 kcal vs 330 kcal).
- Comté has 75% less fat (6.8 g vs 27 g).
- Comté has 76% less saturated fat (4.4 g vs 18 g).
- Comté has no sugar, while Munster has 1 g.
- Comté has 91% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.8 g).
- Munster has 74% more protein (20 g vs 5.2 g).
- Comté has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Munster
Lait de vache pasteurisé.
Comté
LAIT cru, sel, ferments lactiques (LAIT), présure.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Munster or Comté?
Overall, Comté has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Comté has fewer calories: 82 kcal versus 330 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Comté has less sugar: 0 g versus 1 g per 100 g.