Comparison
Munster vs Comté râpé
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Munster | Comté râpé |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 330 kcal | 410 kcal |
| Fat | 27 g | 34 g |
| Saturated fat | 18 g | 22 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 26 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Munster has 20% fewer calories (330 kcal vs 410 kcal).
- Munster has 21% less fat (27 g vs 34 g).
- Munster has 18% less saturated fat (18 g vs 22 g).
- Comté râpé has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Comté râpé has 55% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.8 g).
- Comté râpé has 23% more protein (26 g vs 20 g).
Ingredients
Munster
Lait de vache pasteurisé.
Comté râpé
LAIT cru, sel, ferments lactiques (LAIT), présure. Élaboré à partir de lait origine France, collecté dans la zone d'appellation.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Munster or Comté râpé?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Munster has fewer calories: 330 kcal versus 410 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Comté râpé has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.