Rocamadour AOP vs Comté râpé
Overall, Rocamadour AOP has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rocamadour AOP | Comté râpé |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 292 kcal | 410 kcal |
| Fat | 24 g | 34 g |
| Saturated fat | 17 g | 22 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 18 g | 26 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rocamadour AOP has 29% fewer calories (292 kcal vs 410 kcal).
- Rocamadour AOP has 29% less fat (24 g vs 34 g).
- Rocamadour AOP has 23% less saturated fat (17 g vs 22 g).
- Comté râpé has 31% more protein (26 g vs 18 g).
- Rocamadour AOP has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Rocamadour AOP
_Lait_ cru de chèvre, ferments _lactiques_, sel, présure.
Comté râpé
LAIT cru, sel, ferments lactiques (LAIT), présure. Élaboré à partir de lait origine France, collecté dans la zone d'appellation.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rocamadour AOP or Comté râpé?
Overall, Rocamadour AOP has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rocamadour AOP has fewer calories: 292 kcal versus 410 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rocamadour AOP has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.