Roast British Peppered Topside of Beef vs Viande de boeuf
Overall, Roast British Peppered Topside of Beef has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Roast British Peppered Topsi... | Viande de boeuf |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 137 kcal | 250 kcal |
| Fat | 4.1 g | 16 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.6 g | 6.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | 1 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 23.6 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Beef | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Roast British Peppered Topside of Beef has 45% fewer calories (137 kcal vs 250 kcal).
- Roast British Peppered Topside of Beef has 74% less fat (4.1 g vs 16 g).
- Roast British Peppered Topside of Beef has 76% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 6.6 g).
- Roast British Peppered Topside of Beef has no sugar, while Viande de boeuf has 1 g.
- Roast British Peppered Topside of Beef has 86% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.7 g).
- Roast British Peppered Topside of Beef has 19% more protein (23.6 g vs 19 g).
- Roast British Peppered Topside of Beef has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Roast British Peppered Topside of Beef lists: Beef.
Ingredients
Roast British Peppered Topside of Beef
BEEF, Black Pepper, Salt, Stabiliser: Triphosphates,
Viande de boeuf
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Roast British Peppered Topside of Beef or Viande de boeuf?
Overall, Roast British Peppered Topside of Beef has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Roast British Peppered Topside of Beef has fewer calories: 137 kcal versus 250 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Roast British Peppered Topside of Beef has less sugar: 0 g versus 1 g per 100 g.