Kjøttkaker vs Viande de boeuf
Overall, Kjøttkaker has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kjøttkaker | Viande de boeuf |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 198 kcal | 250 kcal |
| Fat | 14 g | 16 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.4 g | 6.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Melkesukker | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kjøttkaker has 21% fewer calories (198 kcal vs 250 kcal).
- Kjøttkaker has 13% less fat (14 g vs 16 g).
- Kjøttkaker has 18% less saturated fat (5.4 g vs 6.6 g).
- Kjøttkaker has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Viande de boeuf has 90% more fiber (1 g vs 0.1 g).
- Viande de boeuf has 32% more protein (19 g vs 13 g).
- Only Kjøttkaker lists: Milk, Melkesukker.
Ingredients
Kjøttkaker
Storfe - og svinekjøtt (71 %), vann, potetmel, salt, _melkesukker_, _melkeprotein_, vegetabilsk fiber (sitrus), rapsolje, krydder (muskat, pepper, ingefær).
Viande de boeuf
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kjøttkaker or Viande de boeuf?
Overall, Kjøttkaker has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kjøttkaker has fewer calories: 198 kcal versus 250 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kjøttkaker has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.