Comparison

Bœuf cuit en tranche vs Kjøttkaker

Overall, Bœuf cuit en tranche has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBœuf cuit en trancheKjøttkaker
Nutri-Score — d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 102 kcal 198 kcal
Fat 4.3 g 14 g
Saturated fat — 5.4 g
Sugars 0.9 g 0.5 g
Salt 2.1 g 1.8 g
Fiber — 0.1 g
Protein 15 g 13 g
Additives50
AllergensNone listedMilk, Melkesukker

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bœuf cuit en tranche has 48% fewer calories (102 kcal vs 198 kcal).
  • Bœuf cuit en tranche has 69% less fat (4.3 g vs 14 g).
  • Kjøttkaker has 44% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Kjøttkaker has 14% less salt (1.8 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Bœuf cuit en tranche has 13% more protein (15 g vs 13 g).
  • Only Kjøttkaker lists: Milk, Melkesukker.

Ingredients

Bœuf cuit en tranche

Viande de boeuf, sel, sirop de glucose, stabilisant E451 E452, antioxydant E316, conservateur E250, gélatine, aromes naturels.

Kjøttkaker

Storfe - og svinekjøtt (71 %), vann, potetmel, salt, _melkesukker_, _melkeprotein_, vegetabilsk fiber (sitrus), rapsolje, krydder (muskat, pepper, ingefær).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bœuf cuit en tranche or Kjøttkaker?

Overall, Bœuf cuit en tranche has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bœuf cuit en tranche has fewer calories: 102 kcal versus 198 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kjøttkaker has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons