Riz Châtaigne vs Hanfsamen
Overall, Hanfsamen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riz Châtaigne | Hanfsamen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 66 kcal | 621 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 52.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 5.4 g |
| Sugars | 6.5 g | 2.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | — |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 32.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Riz Châtaigne has 89% fewer calories (66 kcal vs 621 kcal).
- Riz Châtaigne has 98% less fat (1 g vs 52.1 g).
- Riz Châtaigne has 98% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 5.4 g).
- Hanfsamen has 57% less sugar (2.8 g vs 6.5 g).
- Hanfsamen has 98% more protein (32.6 g vs 0.5 g).
- Hanfsamen has the better Nutri-Score.
- Hanfsamen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Riz Châtaigne lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Riz Châtaigne
Eau, purée de châtaigne, riz, huile de tournesol, sel marin.
Hanfsamen
Hanfsamen geschält
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz Châtaigne or Hanfsamen?
Overall, Hanfsamen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Riz Châtaigne has fewer calories: 66 kcal versus 621 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hanfsamen has less sugar: 2.8 g versus 6.5 g per 100 g.