Comparison
Riz Châtaigne vs Picadita
Overall, Picadita has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riz Châtaigne | Picadita |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 66 kcal | 480 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 23.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 3.3 g |
| Sugars | 6.5 g | 5.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | 9.9 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 17.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Riz Châtaigne has 86% fewer calories (66 kcal vs 480 kcal).
- Riz Châtaigne has 96% less fat (1 g vs 23.4 g).
- Riz Châtaigne has 97% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 3.3 g).
- Picadita has 14% less sugar (5.6 g vs 6.5 g).
- Riz Châtaigne has no salt, while Picadita has 0.9 g.
- Picadita has 94% more fiber (9.9 g vs 0.6 g).
- Picadita has 97% more protein (17.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Picadita has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Riz Châtaigne lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Riz Châtaigne
Eau, purée de châtaigne, riz, huile de tournesol, sel marin.
Picadita
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz Châtaigne or Picadita?
Overall, Picadita has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Riz Châtaigne has fewer calories: 66 kcal versus 480 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Picadita has less sugar: 5.6 g versus 6.5 g per 100 g.