Riz au lait nature vs Riz au lait nature
Overall, Riz au lait nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riz au lait nature | Riz au lait nature |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 121 kcal | 117 kcal |
| Fat | 3 g | 2.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.1 g | 1.9 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 11 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 4.4 g | 2.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Riz au lait nature has 91% less sugar (1 g vs 11 g).
- Riz au lait nature has 36% more protein (4.4 g vs 2.8 g).
- Riz au lait nature has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Riz au lait nature lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Riz au lait nature
Not available.
Riz au lait nature
Lait entier 65%, eau, riz 10%, sucre 9%, amidon de riz, crème, poudre de lait écrémé, sel. Traces de gluten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz au lait nature or Riz au lait nature?
Overall, Riz au lait nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Riz au lait nature has fewer calories: 117 kcal versus 121 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riz au lait nature has less sugar: 1 g versus 11 g per 100 g.