Comparison
Risoni vs Bio dinkel spätzli
Overall, Risoni has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Risoni | Bio dinkel spätzli |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 336 kcal | 165 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 2.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 5.2 g | — |
| Protein | 15 g | 6.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bio dinkel spätzli has 51% fewer calories (165 kcal vs 336 kcal).
- Risoni has 35% less fat (1.5 g vs 2.3 g).
- Risoni has no salt, while Bio dinkel spätzli has 1 g.
- Risoni has 55% more protein (15 g vs 6.7 g).
- Risoni has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Risoni
Not available.
Bio dinkel spätzli
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Risoni or Bio dinkel spätzli?
Overall, Risoni has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bio dinkel spätzli has fewer calories: 165 kcal versus 336 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bio dinkel spätzli has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 1 g per 100 g.