Comparison
Bio dinkel spätzli vs Pates de Riz
Overall, Pates de Riz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bio dinkel spätzli | Pates de Riz |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 165 kcal | 356 kcal |
| Fat | 2.3 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bio dinkel spätzli has 54% fewer calories (165 kcal vs 356 kcal).
- Pates de Riz has 65% less fat (0.8 g vs 2.3 g).
- Pates de Riz has no sugar, while Bio dinkel spätzli has 0.8 g.
- Pates de Riz has 95% less salt (0.1 g vs 1 g).
- Pates de Riz has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Bio dinkel spätzli
Not available.
Pates de Riz
FARINE DE RIZ (90%), EAU INGREDIENTS: RICE FLOUR (90%), WATER
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio dinkel spätzli or Pates de Riz?
Overall, Pates de Riz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bio dinkel spätzli has fewer calories: 165 kcal versus 356 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pates de Riz has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.