Comparison
Hörnli Gross vs Pates de Riz
Overall, Pates de Riz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hörnli Gross | Pates de Riz |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 361 kcal | 356 kcal |
| Fat | 3 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 3 g | — |
| Protein | 14 g | 7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pates de Riz has 73% less fat (0.8 g vs 3 g).
- Pates de Riz has 63% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 0.8 g).
- Pates de Riz has no sugar, while Hörnli Gross has 2.5 g.
- Pates de Riz has 89% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Hörnli Gross has 50% more protein (14 g vs 7 g).
- Only Hörnli Gross lists: Eggs, Gluten.
Ingredients
Hörnli Gross
Hartweizengriess, Vollei 13.5% (Freilandhaltung)
Pates de Riz
FARINE DE RIZ (90%), EAU INGREDIENTS: RICE FLOUR (90%), WATER
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hörnli Gross or Pates de Riz?
Overall, Pates de Riz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pates de Riz has fewer calories: 356 kcal versus 361 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pates de Riz has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.