Comparison

Riešutai Chili traškūs vs Wasabi Crispy Coated Peanuts

Overall, Riešutai Chili traškūs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRiešutai Chili traškūsWasabi Crispy Coated Peanuts
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 516 kcal 557 kcal
Fat 32 g 34.8 g
Saturated fat 4.4 g 4 g
Sugars 8.3 g 9 g
Salt 2.2 g 2.6 g
Fiber — 4.7 g
Protein 14.1 g 14.9 g
Additives12
AllergensGluten, Peanuts, SoybeansGluten, Milk, Mustard, Peanuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Riešutai Chili traškūs has 14% less salt (2.2 g vs 2.6 g).
  • Only Riešutai Chili traškūs lists: Soybeans.
  • Only Wasabi Crispy Coated Peanuts lists: Milk, Mustard.

Ingredients

Riešutai Chili traškūs

46% _Erdnusskerne_, Stärke (Mais, _Weizen_), _Weizenmehl_, pflanzliche Öle (Ölpalme, Sonnenblume), Zucker, Gewürze (Curry, 0,3% Chili, Cayennepfeffer, Schwarzer Pfeffer, Jalapeñopulver, Knoblauch, Zwiebel), Speisesalz, hydrolysiertes Pflanzeneiweiß (_Soja_, Mais), Aroma, Kräuter, Säureregulator: Citronensäure. Kann Spuren von Schalenfrüchten enthalten.

Wasabi Crispy Coated Peanuts

46% cacahuètes (arachides), amidon (mais, blé), farine de blé, huile de tournesol, sucre, sel, dextrose, arôme, épices, graines de moutarde, extrait de levure, acidifiant : acide citrique, wasabi en poudre, colorant : complexes cuivriques de chlorophylles et de chlorophyllines,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Riešutai Chili traškūs or Wasabi Crispy Coated Peanuts?

Overall, Riešutai Chili traškūs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Riešutai Chili traškūs has fewer calories: 516 kcal versus 557 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Riešutai Chili traškūs has less sugar: 8.3 g versus 9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons