Riešutai Chili traškūs vs Bénénuts Twinuts original format familial
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riešutai Chili traškūs | Bénénuts Twinuts original fo... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 516 kcal | 543 kcal |
| Fat | 32 g | 34 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.4 g | 4.9 g |
| Sugars | 8.3 g | 6 g |
| Salt | 2.2 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | — | 3 g |
| Protein | 14.1 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Peanuts, Soybeans | Gluten, Peanuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Riešutai Chili traškūs has 10% less saturated fat (4.4 g vs 4.9 g).
- Bénénuts Twinuts original format familial has 28% less sugar (6 g vs 8.3 g).
- Only Riešutai Chili traškūs lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Riešutai Chili traškūs
46% _Erdnusskerne_, Stärke (Mais, _Weizen_), _Weizenmehl_, pflanzliche Öle (Ölpalme, Sonnenblume), Zucker, Gewürze (Curry, 0,3% Chili, Cayennepfeffer, Schwarzer Pfeffer, Jalapeñopulver, Knoblauch, Zwiebel), Speisesalz, hydrolysiertes Pflanzeneiweiß (_Soja_, Mais), Aroma, Kräuter, Säureregulator: Citronensäure. Kann Spuren von Schalenfrüchten enthalten.
Bénénuts Twinuts original format familial
CACAHUÈTES (38%),farine de riz,amidon (BLÉ et maïs),huile de tournesol,sucre,base aromatisante goût salé [arômes, poudre d'oignon, épices et herbes, acidifiant (acide citrique)],sel,sucre caramélisé
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riešutai Chili traškūs or Bénénuts Twinuts original format familial?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Riešutai Chili traškūs has fewer calories: 516 kcal versus 543 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bénénuts Twinuts original format familial has less sugar: 6 g versus 8.3 g per 100 g.