Ricotta vs Ricotta 11% Mat. Gr.
Overall, Ricotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ricotta | Ricotta 11% Mat. Gr. |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 148 kcal | 155 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 11 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.1 g | 7.6 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 4.3 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 7.3 g | 8 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ricotta has 21% less sugar (3.4 g vs 4.3 g).
Ingredients
Ricotta
_Lactosérum_* de vache, _crème_* pasteurisée de vache, sel, correcteur d'acidité : acide citrique. *Lactosérum et crème origine UE.
Ricotta 11% Mat. Gr.
Lactosérum pasteurisé (origine UE) ; correcteurs d'acidité : acide lactique, acide citrique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ricotta or Ricotta 11% Mat. Gr.?
Overall, Ricotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ricotta has fewer calories: 148 kcal versus 155 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ricotta has less sugar: 3.4 g versus 4.3 g per 100 g.