Ricotta 11% Mat. Gr. vs Ricotta
Overall, Ricotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ricotta 11% Mat. Gr. | Ricotta |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 155 kcal | 150 kcal |
| Fat | 11 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.6 g | 8.4 g |
| Sugars | 4.3 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 8 g | 7.5 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ricotta has 30% less sugar (3 g vs 4.3 g).
Ingredients
Ricotta 11% Mat. Gr.
Lactosérum pasteurisé (origine UE) ; correcteurs d'acidité : acide lactique, acide citrique.
Ricotta
sérum de _lait_ pasteurisé, _crème_, sel, correcteur d'acidité : acide citrique
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ricotta 11% Mat. Gr. or Ricotta?
Overall, Ricotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ricotta has fewer calories: 150 kcal versus 155 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ricotta has less sugar: 3 g versus 4.3 g per 100 g.