Ricotta vs Galbani ricotta 250g 12%mg
Overall, Ricotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ricotta | Galbani ricotta 250g 12%mg |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 150 kcal | 164 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.4 g | 8.3 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 4.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 7.5 g | 8 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ricotta has 33% less sugar (3 g vs 4.5 g).
- Ricotta has no salt, while Galbani ricotta 250g 12%mg has 0.4 g.
Ingredients
Ricotta
sérum de _lait_ pasteurisé, _crème_, sel, correcteur d'acidité : acide citrique
Galbani ricotta 250g 12%mg
Lactosérum pasteurisé (LAIT), Crème de lactosérum (LAIT), sel, correcteur d'acidité: acide lactique, acide citrique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ricotta or Galbani ricotta 250g 12%mg?
Overall, Ricotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ricotta has fewer calories: 150 kcal versus 164 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ricotta has less sugar: 3 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.