Ricotta vs Galbani ricotta 250g 12%mg
Overall, Ricotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ricotta | Galbani ricotta 250g 12%mg |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 95 kcal | 164 kcal |
| Fat | 5 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.6 g | 8.3 g |
| Sugars | 2.9 g | 4.5 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 8.5 g | 8 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ricotta has 42% fewer calories (95 kcal vs 164 kcal).
- Ricotta has 58% less fat (5 g vs 12 g).
- Ricotta has 57% less saturated fat (3.6 g vs 8.3 g).
- Ricotta has 36% less sugar (2.9 g vs 4.5 g).
- Ricotta has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Ricotta
Lactosérum, sel, correcteur d'acidité: acide citrique.
Galbani ricotta 250g 12%mg
Lactosérum pasteurisé (LAIT), Crème de lactosérum (LAIT), sel, correcteur d'acidité: acide lactique, acide citrique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ricotta or Galbani ricotta 250g 12%mg?
Overall, Ricotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ricotta has fewer calories: 95 kcal versus 164 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ricotta has less sugar: 2.9 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.