Comparison
Ricotta vs Ricotta
Overall, Ricotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ricotta | Ricotta |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 95 kcal | 179 kcal |
| Fat | 5 g | 14 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.6 g | 9.8 g |
| Sugars | 2.9 g | 2.8 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.4 g |
| Protein | 8.5 g | 9.7 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ricotta has 47% fewer calories (95 kcal vs 179 kcal).
- Ricotta has 64% less fat (5 g vs 14 g).
- Ricotta has 63% less saturated fat (3.6 g vs 9.8 g).
- Ricotta has 12% more protein (9.7 g vs 8.5 g).
- Ricotta has the better Nutri-Score.
- Ricotta is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Ricotta
Lactosérum, sel, correcteur d'acidité: acide citrique.
Ricotta
Suero de _leche_ pasteurizada de vaca y cabra, _nata_ y corrector de acidez (ácido láctico).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ricotta or Ricotta?
Overall, Ricotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ricotta has fewer calories: 95 kcal versus 179 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ricotta has less sugar: 2.8 g versus 2.9 g per 100 g.