Ricotta vs Ricotta
Overall, Ricotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ricotta | Ricotta |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 148 kcal | 95 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 5 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.1 g | 3.6 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 2.9 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 7.3 g | 8.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ricotta has 36% fewer calories (95 kcal vs 148 kcal).
- Ricotta has 58% less fat (5 g vs 12 g).
- Ricotta has 56% less saturated fat (3.6 g vs 8.1 g).
- Ricotta has 15% less sugar (2.9 g vs 3.4 g).
- Ricotta has 14% more protein (8.5 g vs 7.3 g).
- Ricotta has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Ricotta
_Lactosérum_* de vache, _crème_* pasteurisée de vache, sel, correcteur d'acidité : acide citrique. *Lactosérum et crème origine UE.
Ricotta
Lactosérum, sel, correcteur d'acidité: acide citrique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ricotta or Ricotta?
Overall, Ricotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ricotta has fewer calories: 95 kcal versus 148 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ricotta has less sugar: 2.9 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.