Galbani ricotta 250g 12%mg vs Ricotta
Overall, Ricotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Galbani ricotta 250g 12%mg | Ricotta |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 164 kcal | 179 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 14 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.3 g | 9.8 g |
| Sugars | 4.5 g | 2.8 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 8 g | 9.7 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Galbani ricotta 250g 12%mg has 14% less fat (12 g vs 14 g).
- Galbani ricotta 250g 12%mg has 15% less saturated fat (8.3 g vs 9.8 g).
- Ricotta has 38% less sugar (2.8 g vs 4.5 g).
- Ricotta has 18% more protein (9.7 g vs 8 g).
- Ricotta is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Galbani ricotta 250g 12%mg
Lactosérum pasteurisé (LAIT), Crème de lactosérum (LAIT), sel, correcteur d'acidité: acide lactique, acide citrique.
Ricotta
Suero de _leche_ pasteurizada de vaca y cabra, _nata_ y corrector de acidez (ácido láctico).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Galbani ricotta 250g 12%mg or Ricotta?
Overall, Ricotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Galbani ricotta 250g 12%mg has fewer calories: 164 kcal versus 179 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ricotta has less sugar: 2.8 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.