Comparison

Rice Cakes vs Crunchy Rice Crisps Fuego Lime

Overall, Rice Cakes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRice CakesCrunchy Rice Crisps Fuego Li...
Nutri-Score c e
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 364 kcal 533 kcal
Fat 0 g 30 g
Saturated fat 0 g 1.7 g
Sugars 0 g 30 g
Salt 1.1 g 1.8 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 0 g 3.3 g
Additives03
AllergensNone listedSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Rice Cakes has 32% fewer calories (364 kcal vs 533 kcal).
  • Rice Cakes has no fat, while Crunchy Rice Crisps Fuego Lime has 30 g.
  • Rice Cakes has no saturated fat, while Crunchy Rice Crisps Fuego Lime has 1.7 g.
  • Rice Cakes has no sugar, while Crunchy Rice Crisps Fuego Lime has 30 g.
  • Rice Cakes has 38% less salt (1.1 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Crunchy Rice Crisps Fuego Lime has 100% more protein (3.3 g vs 0 g).
  • Rice Cakes has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Rice Cakes is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Crunchy Rice Crisps Fuego Lime lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Rice Cakes

Brown rice, sea salt. May contain traces of sesame and sy.

Crunchy Rice Crisps Fuego Lime

STICKY RICE (GLUTINOUS RICE, WATERMELON JUICE CONCENTRATE, SUGAR, SALT), CANOLA OIL AND/OR SOYBEAN OIL AND/OR SUNFLOWER OIL, SEASONING (MALTO-DEXTRIN, SUGAR, SALT, CITRIC ACID, YEAST EXTRACT, PAPRIKA, SPICES, PAPRIKA EXTRACT, ONION POWDER, LIME JUICE, NATURAL FLAVOR, LIME OIL, SILICON DIOXIDE ADDED TO PREVENT CAKING)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rice Cakes or Crunchy Rice Crisps Fuego Lime?

Overall, Rice Cakes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rice Cakes has fewer calories: 364 kcal versus 533 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rice Cakes has less sugar: 0 g versus 30 g per 100 g.

More comparisons