Comparison

Regenbogenforellenfilets über Eichenholzrauch heiß geräuchert vs Gerookte forelfilets

Overall, Gerookte forelfilets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRegenbogenforellenfilets übe...Gerookte forelfilets
Nutri-Score d —
NOVA group — 3
Calories 157 kcal 138 kcal
Fat 7.7 g 5.5 g
Saturated fat 1.7 g 0.2 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 2 g 0.4 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 22.8 g 22 g
Additives00
AllergensRegenbogenforellenfiletsFish, Poisson

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Gerookte forelfilets has 12% fewer calories (138 kcal vs 157 kcal).
  • Gerookte forelfilets has 29% less fat (5.5 g vs 7.7 g).
  • Gerookte forelfilets has 88% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Gerookte forelfilets has 81% less salt (0.4 g vs 2 g).
  • Only Regenbogenforellenfilets über Eichenholzrauch heiß geräuchert lists: Regenbogenforellenfilets.
  • Only Gerookte forelfilets lists: Fish, Poisson.

Ingredients

Regenbogenforellenfilets über Eichenholzrauch heiß geräuchert

97% Regenbogenforellenfilets, Speisesalz, Eichenholzrauch.

Gerookte forelfilets

97 % truite arc-en-ciel (Oncorhynchus mykiss, élevée au Danemark), sel. Contient du poisson.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Regenbogenforellenfilets über Eichenholzrauch heiß geräuchert or Gerookte forelfilets?

Overall, Gerookte forelfilets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Gerookte forelfilets has fewer calories: 138 kcal versus 157 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Regenbogenforellenfilets über Eichenholzrauch heiß geräuchert has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons