Regenbogenforellen Filets vs Lachsforelle
Overall, Regenbogenforellen Filets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Regenbogenforellen Filets | Lachsforelle |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 122 kcal | 155 kcal |
| Fat | 5 g | 9.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 2.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Regenbogenforellen Filets has 21% fewer calories (122 kcal vs 155 kcal).
- Regenbogenforellen Filets has 46% less fat (5 g vs 9.3 g).
- Regenbogenforellen Filets has 52% less saturated fat (1 g vs 2.1 g).
- Regenbogenforellen Filets has no sugar, while Lachsforelle has 0.5 g.
Ingredients
Regenbogenforellen Filets
Not available.
Lachsforelle
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Regenbogenforellen Filets or Lachsforelle?
Overall, Regenbogenforellen Filets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Regenbogenforellen Filets has fewer calories: 122 kcal versus 155 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Regenbogenforellen Filets has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.