Regenbogen Forellenfilets vs Gerookte forelfilets
Overall, Gerookte forelfilets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Regenbogen Forellenfilets | Gerookte forelfilets |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 138 kcal | 138 kcal |
| Fat | 5.5 g | 5.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.4 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2.3 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 22 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish, Poisson |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Gerookte forelfilets has 86% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 1.4 g).
- Gerookte forelfilets has 83% less salt (0.4 g vs 2.3 g).
- Only Gerookte forelfilets lists: Poisson.
Ingredients
Regenbogen Forellenfilets
97.7% Regenbogenforellenfilet, Speisesalz, Buchenholzrauch
Gerookte forelfilets
97 % truite arc-en-ciel (Oncorhynchus mykiss, élevée au Danemark), sel. Contient du poisson.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Regenbogen Forellenfilets or Gerookte forelfilets?
Overall, Gerookte forelfilets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Regenbogen Forellenfilets has fewer calories: 138 kcal versus 138 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Regenbogen Forellenfilets has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.