Pavés de Truite vs Regenbogen Forellenfilets
Overall, Pavés de Truite has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pavés de Truite | Regenbogen Forellenfilets |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 150 kcal | 138 kcal |
| Fat | 8 g | 5.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 1.4 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 2.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Regenbogen Forellenfilets has 31% less fat (5.5 g vs 8 g).
- Regenbogen Forellenfilets has 30% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 2 g).
- Pavés de Truite has no salt, while Regenbogen Forellenfilets has 2.3 g.
- Regenbogen Forellenfilets has 14% more protein (22 g vs 19 g).
- Pavés de Truite has the better Nutri-Score.
- Pavés de Truite is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Pavés de Truite
Truite
Regenbogen Forellenfilets
97.7% Regenbogenforellenfilet, Speisesalz, Buchenholzrauch
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pavés de Truite or Regenbogen Forellenfilets?
Overall, Pavés de Truite has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Regenbogen Forellenfilets has fewer calories: 138 kcal versus 150 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pavés de Truite has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.