Rauchkäse vs Rügener Hartkäse 50% Fett i. Tr.
Overall, Rauchkäse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rauchkäse | Rügener Hartkäse 50% Fett i.... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 337 kcal | 389 kcal |
| Fat | 26 g | 33 g |
| Saturated fat | 18 g | 22.8 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 25 g | 23 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rauchkäse has 13% fewer calories (337 kcal vs 389 kcal).
- Rauchkäse has 21% less fat (26 g vs 33 g).
- Rauchkäse has 21% less saturated fat (18 g vs 22.8 g).
- Rauchkäse has 40% less salt (1.2 g vs 2 g).
- Rauchkäse has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Rauchkäse
Pasteurisierte _Milch_, Speisesalz, Reifungskulturen, Rauch, mikrobielles Lab.
Rügener Hartkäse 50% Fett i. Tr.
pasteurisierte _Kuhmilch_, Speisesalz, Säuerungskulturen, mikrobielles Lab, Rotschmierkultur zur Oberflächenreifung
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rauchkäse or Rügener Hartkäse 50% Fett i. Tr.?
Overall, Rauchkäse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rauchkäse has fewer calories: 337 kcal versus 389 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rauchkäse has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.