Kleiner Bergler vs Rügener Hartkäse 50% Fett i. Tr.
Overall, Kleiner Bergler has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Kleiner Bergler
Rügener Hartkäse 50% Fett i. Tr.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kleiner Bergler | Rügener Hartkäse 50% Fett i.... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 362 kcal | 389 kcal |
| Fat | 29 g | 33 g |
| Saturated fat | 19 g | 22.8 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 26 g | 23 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kleiner Bergler has 12% less fat (29 g vs 33 g).
- Kleiner Bergler has 17% less saturated fat (19 g vs 22.8 g).
- Kleiner Bergler has 12% more protein (26 g vs 23 g).
Ingredients
Kleiner Bergler
Kuhmilch, Käsereikulturen, Salz, tierisches Lab
Rügener Hartkäse 50% Fett i. Tr.
pasteurisierte _Kuhmilch_, Speisesalz, Säuerungskulturen, mikrobielles Lab, Rotschmierkultur zur Oberflächenreifung
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kleiner Bergler or Rügener Hartkäse 50% Fett i. Tr.?
Overall, Kleiner Bergler has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kleiner Bergler has fewer calories: 362 kcal versus 389 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kleiner Bergler has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.