Räuchertofu Black Forest vs Smoked Tofu
Overall, Smoked Tofu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Räuchertofu Black Forest | Smoked Tofu |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 170 kcal | 146 kcal |
| Fat | 8.4 g | 7.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.6 g | 1.2 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 2.7 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 16.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Soybeans, Sojabohnen, Sojasauce*, Weizen | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Smoked Tofu has 14% fewer calories (146 kcal vs 170 kcal).
- Smoked Tofu has 25% less saturated fat (1.2 g vs 1.6 g).
- Smoked Tofu has 99% less sugar (0 g vs 1.1 g).
- Smoked Tofu has 78% less salt (0.4 g vs 1.9 g).
- Räuchertofu Black Forest has 71% more fiber (2.7 g vs 0.8 g).
- Räuchertofu Black Forest has 11% more protein (19 g vs 16.9 g).
- Smoked Tofu has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Räuchertofu Black Forest lists: Gluten, Sojabohnen, Sojasauce*, Weizen.
Ingredients
Räuchertofu Black Forest
Tofu* 91% (_Sojabohnen_* 55%, Wasser, Gerinnungsmittel: Magnesiumchlorid, Calciumsulfat), Sojasauce* (Wasser, _Sojabohnen_*, _Weizen_, Meersalz), Zwiebeln*, Kümmel*, Petersilie*, Buchenholzreiberauch. *aus biologischem Anbau Kann Spuren von Schalenfrüchten, Sellerie, Senf und Sesam enthalten.
Smoked Tofu
Tofu (Water, _Soya_ Beans (31%), Nigari), Sea Salt.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Räuchertofu Black Forest or Smoked Tofu?
Overall, Smoked Tofu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Smoked Tofu has fewer calories: 146 kcal versus 170 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Smoked Tofu has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.