Comparison
Rahmquark vs Sahnequark
Overall, Sahnequark has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rahmquark | Sahnequark |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 194 kcal | 130 kcal |
| Fat | 16.7 g | 9.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.9 g | 6.4 g |
| Sugars | 5 g | 3.2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 6 g | 8.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sahnequark has 33% fewer calories (130 kcal vs 194 kcal).
- Sahnequark has 45% less fat (9.2 g vs 16.7 g).
- Sahnequark has 35% less saturated fat (6.4 g vs 9.9 g).
- Sahnequark has 36% less sugar (3.2 g vs 5 g).
- Sahnequark has 31% more protein (8.7 g vs 6 g).
- Only Rahmquark lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Rahmquark
Magerquark, Rahm
Sahnequark
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rahmquark or Sahnequark?
Overall, Sahnequark has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sahnequark has fewer calories: 130 kcal versus 194 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sahnequark has less sugar: 3.2 g versus 5 g per 100 g.