Comparison
Rahmquark vs Bio Topfen
Overall, Bio Topfen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rahmquark | Bio Topfen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 194 kcal | 178 kcal |
| Fat | 16.7 g | 14.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.9 g | 9.4 g |
| Sugars | 5 g | 3.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 6 g | 8.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bio Topfen has 14% less fat (14.3 g vs 16.7 g).
- Bio Topfen has 28% less sugar (3.6 g vs 5 g).
- Bio Topfen has 29% more protein (8.4 g vs 6 g).
Ingredients
Rahmquark
Magerquark, Rahm
Bio Topfen
Speisequark
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rahmquark or Bio Topfen?
Overall, Bio Topfen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bio Topfen has fewer calories: 178 kcal versus 194 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bio Topfen has less sugar: 3.6 g versus 5 g per 100 g.