Rahmquark vs Fitline protein fraise
Overall, Fitline protein fraise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rahmquark | Fitline protein fraise |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 194 kcal | 58 kcal |
| Fat | 16.7 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.9 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 5 g | 5.8 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 6 g | 7.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fitline protein fraise has 70% fewer calories (58 kcal vs 194 kcal).
- Fitline protein fraise has 99% less fat (0.2 g vs 16.7 g).
- Fitline protein fraise has 99% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 9.9 g).
- Rahmquark has 14% less sugar (5 g vs 5.8 g).
- Fitline protein fraise has 20% more protein (7.5 g vs 6 g).
- Fitline protein fraise has the better Nutri-Score.
- Rahmquark is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Rahmquark
Magerquark, Rahm
Fitline protein fraise
Speisequark,10% Fruchtzubereitung Erdbeere ( 40% Erdbeeren Glucose-Fructose-Sirup,Zucker,modifizierte Stärke, Aroma,färbende Frucht-und Pflanzenkonzentrate, Johannisbeere,Karotte,Süßu ngsmittel Sucralose, Acesulfam K) ,5% Joguhrt aus entrahmter Milch,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rahmquark or Fitline protein fraise?
Overall, Fitline protein fraise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fitline protein fraise has fewer calories: 58 kcal versus 194 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rahmquark has less sugar: 5 g versus 5.8 g per 100 g.