Comparison

Purée de légumes verts bio vs Chicken soup cubes

Overall, Chicken soup cubes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPurée de légumes verts bioChicken soup cubes
Nutri-Score — c
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 40 kcal 4 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0.1 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.1 g
Sugars 1.9 g 0.1 g
Salt — 1.2 g
Fiber 3.2 g —
Protein 3.6 g 0.2 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedCelery, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chicken soup cubes has 90% fewer calories (4 kcal vs 40 kcal).
  • Chicken soup cubes has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Chicken soup cubes has 95% less sugar (0.1 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Purée de légumes verts bio has 94% more protein (3.6 g vs 0.2 g).
  • Purée de légumes verts bio is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Chicken soup cubes lists: Celery, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Purée de légumes verts bio

FR Haricot vert* 38,2%, brocoli* 30%, petit pois doux* 22,8%, eau. *Issu de l'agriculture biologique.

Chicken soup cubes

Sel, amidon, exhausteur de goût: glutamate monosodique; extrait de protéines de soja, graisse de palme, sucre, épices, 1% viande et graisse de poulet, arômes (contient céleri), 0,18% carottes, 0,13% oignons, 0,08% céleri, 0,08% poireaux verts, 0,03% choux, antioxydant: extraits de romarin. Peut contenir des traces de céréales contenant du gluten, de lait, d'œuf, de poissons et de crustacés.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Purée de légumes verts bio or Chicken soup cubes?

Overall, Chicken soup cubes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chicken soup cubes has fewer calories: 4 kcal versus 40 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chicken soup cubes has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons