Pure de calabacin casa vs Surkål
Overall, Surkål has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pure de calabacin casa | Surkål |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 81 kcal | 45 kcal |
| Fat | 5.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 4.7 g | 9.3 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 1.1 g |
| Protein | 1.5 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Surkål has 44% fewer calories (45 kcal vs 81 kcal).
- Surkål has 91% less fat (0.5 g vs 5.4 g).
- Surkål has no saturated fat, while Pure de calabacin casa has 0.7 g.
- Pure de calabacin casa has 49% less sugar (4.7 g vs 9.3 g).
- Surkål has 26% less salt (1.1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Pure de calabacin casa has 33% more protein (1.5 g vs 1 g).
- Only Surkål lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Pure de calabacin casa
Melonenkürbisse 82.9% Möhren Sonnenblumenöl Tomatenmark Zwiebeln Salz, Zucker Sellerie Gewürze Konservierungsstoff E202
Surkål
strimlet hodekål 72 %, lake (vann, sukker, eddik, salt, konserveringsmiddel (natriumbenzoat), fortykningsmiddel (guarkjernemel), krydder), karve.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pure de calabacin casa or Surkål?
Overall, Surkål has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Surkål has fewer calories: 45 kcal versus 81 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pure de calabacin casa has less sugar: 4.7 g versus 9.3 g per 100 g.