Comparison

Ptits pain bretzel vs Couronne de sils

Overall, Couronne de sils has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPtits pain bretzelCouronne de sils
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 338 kcal 271 kcal
Fat 11 g 3.7 g
Saturated fat 1 g 0.6 g
Sugars 10 g 1.5 g
Salt 1.6 g 1.1 g
Fiber 5.7 g 2.5 g
Protein 7.7 g 9.2 g
Additives13
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Couronne de sils has 20% fewer calories (271 kcal vs 338 kcal).
  • Couronne de sils has 66% less fat (3.7 g vs 11 g).
  • Couronne de sils has 40% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 1 g).
  • Couronne de sils has 85% less sugar (1.5 g vs 10 g).
  • Couronne de sils has 33% less salt (1.1 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Ptits pain bretzel has 56% more fiber (5.7 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Couronne de sils has 16% more protein (9.2 g vs 7.7 g).

Ingredients

Ptits pain bretzel

Farine de BLE 51% - Levain 16% (Farine de BLE, eau, sel) - Huile de colza - Eau - Sucre - Dextrose - Levure - Farine de SEIGLE malté - Sel - GLUTEN de BLE - Fibre de psyllium - Correcteur d'acidité: hydroxyde de sodium.

Couronne de sils

Farine de BLE*, eau, huile de tournesol, levure, sel de cuisine iodé, sucre, correcteur d'acidité: hydroxyde de sodium, émulsifiant: mono - et diglycérides d'acides gras, farine de malt de BLE, farine de malt d'ORGE, agent de traitement de la farine: acide ascorbique, protéines de BLÉ.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Ptits pain bretzel or Couronne de sils?

Overall, Couronne de sils has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Couronne de sils has fewer calories: 271 kcal versus 338 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Couronne de sils has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 10 g per 100 g.

More comparisons