Protein Flour vs Himalayan Pink Salt Lentil Chips
Overall, Protein Flour has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.
Protein Flour
Himalayan Pink Salt Lentil Chips
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Protein Flour | Himalayan Pink Salt Lentil C... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 110 kcal | 500 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 25 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | 2 g | 3.6 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 14.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Protein Flour has 78% fewer calories (110 kcal vs 500 kcal).
- Protein Flour has 96% less fat (1 g vs 25 g).
- Himalayan Pink Salt Lentil Chips has no sugar, while Protein Flour has 1 g.
- Protein Flour has 99% less salt (0 g vs 2 g).
- Himalayan Pink Salt Lentil Chips has 44% more fiber (3.6 g vs 2 g).
- Himalayan Pink Salt Lentil Chips has 30% more protein (14.3 g vs 10 g).
- Protein Flour has the better Nutri-Score.
- Protein Flour is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Protein Flour lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Protein Flour
VITAL _WHEAT_ _GLUTEN_, ORGANIC CHICKPEA FLOUR, ORGANIC WHOLE _WHEAT_ FLOUR, ORGANIC GOLDEN LENTIL FLOUR
Himalayan Pink Salt Lentil Chips
Lentil flour(40%), Corn flour, Expeller Pressed Sunflower oil, Rice Flour, Corn Starch, Potato Starch, Salt, Green pepper powder, Pink Himalayan Sea Salt.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Protein Flour or Himalayan Pink Salt Lentil Chips?
Overall, Protein Flour has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Protein Flour has fewer calories: 110 kcal versus 500 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Himalayan Pink Salt Lentil Chips has less sugar: 0 g versus 1 g per 100 g.