Comparison

Himalayan Pink Salt Lentil Chips vs Chips de Lentejas

Overall, Chips de Lentejas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientHimalayan Pink Salt Lentil C...Chips de Lentejas
Nutri-Score d a
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 500 kcal 423 kcal
Fat 25 g 10 g
Saturated fat 0 g 1.9 g
Sugars 0 g 2.5 g
Salt 2 g 0.5 g
Fiber 3.6 g 6.7 g
Protein 14.3 g 25 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chips de Lentejas has 15% fewer calories (423 kcal vs 500 kcal).
  • Chips de Lentejas has 60% less fat (10 g vs 25 g).
  • Himalayan Pink Salt Lentil Chips has no saturated fat, while Chips de Lentejas has 1.9 g.
  • Himalayan Pink Salt Lentil Chips has no sugar, while Chips de Lentejas has 2.5 g.
  • Chips de Lentejas has 74% less salt (0.5 g vs 2 g).
  • Chips de Lentejas has 46% more fiber (6.7 g vs 3.6 g).
  • Chips de Lentejas has 43% more protein (25 g vs 14.3 g).
  • Chips de Lentejas has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Himalayan Pink Salt Lentil Chips

Lentil flour(40%), Corn flour, Expeller Pressed Sunflower oil, Rice Flour, Corn Starch, Potato Starch, Salt, Green pepper powder, Pink Himalayan Sea Salt.

Chips de Lentejas

FR-PRODUIT D'APÉRITIF DORÉ AU FOUR. Ingrédients: Farine de lentille (89,5%), huile d'olive extra vierge (10%), sel (0,5%). Peut contenir soja et lait.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Himalayan Pink Salt Lentil Chips or Chips de Lentejas?

Overall, Chips de Lentejas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chips de Lentejas has fewer calories: 423 kcal versus 500 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Himalayan Pink Salt Lentil Chips has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons