Prosciutto di Parma vs Pancetta Copatta
Overall, Prosciutto di Parma has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Prosciutto di Parma | Pancetta Copatta |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 254 kcal | 373 kcal |
| Fat | 16 g | 33 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.3 g | 12 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 4.6 g | 3.6 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 27 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Prosciutto di Parma has 32% fewer calories (254 kcal vs 373 kcal).
- Prosciutto di Parma has 52% less fat (16 g vs 33 g).
- Prosciutto di Parma has 56% less saturated fat (5.3 g vs 12 g).
- Pancetta Copatta has 22% less salt (3.6 g vs 4.6 g).
- Prosciutto di Parma has 30% more protein (27 g vs 19 g).
- Prosciutto di Parma is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Prosciutto di Parma
Jambon de porc, sel
Pancetta Copatta
Schweinebauch, Schweinenacken, Salz, Dextrose, Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat; Gewürze und Kräuter, Konservierungsstoffe: Kaliumnitrat, Natriumnitrit; Aromen
FAQ
Which is healthier: Prosciutto di Parma or Pancetta Copatta?
Overall, Prosciutto di Parma has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Prosciutto di Parma has fewer calories: 254 kcal versus 373 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Prosciutto di Parma has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.