Comparison

Prosciutto di Parma vs Gran antipasto italiano

Overall, Prosciutto di Parma has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientProsciutto di ParmaGran antipasto italiano
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 254 kcal 299 kcal
Fat 16 g 21 g
Saturated fat 5.3 g 8.1 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 4.6 g 4.6 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 27 g 28 g
Additives03
AllergensNone listedEggs, Gluten, Milk, Pork

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Prosciutto di Parma has 15% fewer calories (254 kcal vs 299 kcal).
  • Prosciutto di Parma has 24% less fat (16 g vs 21 g).
  • Prosciutto di Parma has 35% less saturated fat (5.3 g vs 8.1 g).
  • Prosciutto di Parma is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Gran antipasto italiano lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Pork.

Ingredients

Prosciutto di Parma

Jambon de porc, sel

Gran antipasto italiano

jambon cru, coppa, saucisson, Viande de porc, sel, dextrose, épices et plantes aromatiques, antioxydants: ascorbate de sodium; conservateurs: nitrate de potassium, nitrite de sodium; arômes.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Prosciutto di Parma or Gran antipasto italiano?

Overall, Prosciutto di Parma has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Prosciutto di Parma has fewer calories: 254 kcal versus 299 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Prosciutto di Parma has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons