Comparison

Gran antipasto italiano vs Jambon cuit nature tranché

Overall, Jambon cuit nature tranché has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGran antipasto italianoJambon cuit nature tranché
Nutri-Score e c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 299 kcal 133 kcal
Fat 21 g 2.2 g
Saturated fat 8.1 g 0.8 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 4.6 g 2 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 28 g 20.5 g
Additives30
AllergensEggs, Gluten, Milk, PorkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Jambon cuit nature tranché has 56% fewer calories (133 kcal vs 299 kcal).
  • Jambon cuit nature tranché has 90% less fat (2.2 g vs 21 g).
  • Jambon cuit nature tranché has 90% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 8.1 g).
  • Jambon cuit nature tranché has 57% less salt (2 g vs 4.6 g).
  • Gran antipasto italiano has 27% more protein (28 g vs 20.5 g).
  • Jambon cuit nature tranché has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Gran antipasto italiano lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Pork.

Ingredients

Gran antipasto italiano

jambon cru, coppa, saucisson, Viande de porc, sel, dextrose, épices et plantes aromatiques, antioxydants: ascorbate de sodium; conservateurs: nitrate de potassium, nitrite de sodium; arômes.

Jambon cuit nature tranché

Jambon de porc, arômes naturels (nitrite d'origine végétale), sel

FAQ

Which is healthier: Gran antipasto italiano or Jambon cuit nature tranché?

Overall, Jambon cuit nature tranché has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Jambon cuit nature tranché has fewer calories: 133 kcal versus 299 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Gran antipasto italiano has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons